Shop our new arrivals:



Use coupon code WELCOME10 for 10% off your first order.

Cart 0

Congratulations! Your order qualifies for free shipping You are $200 away from free shipping.
Sorry, looks like we don't have enough of this product.

Pair with
Is this a gift?
Subtotal Free
View cart
Shipping, taxes, and discount codes are calculated at checkout

Your Cart is Empty

Iran: Weaponizing the Strait of Hormuz

Elliot Ackerman discusses the evolving U.S.-Iran war and Strait of Hormuz on CBS News, alongside footage of an anti-American billboard in Tehran.

In this CBS News appearance, Elliot Ackerman examines how Iran has reshaped the war by turning the Strait of Hormuz into a source of strategic and economic leverage.

How Iran Changed the War

Ackerman explains that the conflict began with broader objectives, including preventing an Iranian nuclear weapon and pressuring the regime. Iran has since elevated the Strait of Hormuz into one of the war’s central issues, changing the strategic priorities facing the United States.

Energy Markets as Strategic Leverage

The Strait’s importance extends beyond military control. Ackerman notes that roughly one-fifth of global oil and natural gas moved through the waterway before the war. For commercial traffic to resume, insurers, shippers, and energy markets must believe vessels can transit safely.

Searching for an Off-Ramp

The discussion also examines what victory might mean for each side. The United States is seeking a path toward ending the conflict, potentially involving the Strait and Iran’s nuclear program.

Iran Does Not Need to Win

Ackerman argues that Tehran may have a simpler objective: avoid losing. By sustaining the status quo and prolonging the conflict, Iran can continue applying political and economic pressure while attempting to outlast Washington.

This CBS News media appearance features Elliot Ackerman discussing Iran, the Strait of Hormuz, energy security, U.S.-Iran war objectives, nuclear policy, military strategy, global oil markets, strategic leverage, political endurance, and the search for a negotiated off-ramp.