In this TIME essay, Elliot Ackerman examines the ethical risks of describing the COVID-19 pandemic as a war and healthcare workers as soldiers.
The Limits of Wartime Language
Ackerman argues that comparisons between medicine and military service can obscure an important distinction. Soldiers accept a formal obligation to risk their lives when ordered, while physicians and nurses operate under different professional and ethical duties.
How Much Risk Must Healthcare Workers Accept?
The essay revisits debates that emerged during the SARS and HIV epidemics about whether medical professionals are obligated to provide care when hospitals cannot adequately protect them. Ackerman emphasizes that many healthcare workers treating COVID-19 patients assumed extraordinary risks beyond the normal scope of their work.
Voluntary Sacrifice and Moral Injury
Presenting doctors and nurses as soldiers can make their deaths appear inevitable and diminish the voluntary nature of their sacrifice. Ackerman warns that this framing may also shape future decisions about disability support, compensation, and how society understands the psychological consequences of frontline medical service.
A Framework of Their Own
Rather than relying on military analogies, Ackerman argues that healthcare workers deserve language that accurately reflects their ethical choices, professional courage, and exposure to danger during the pandemic.
Read the Original Essay
Read “Why Comparing the Fight Against COVID-19 to War Is Ethically Dangerous” at TIME →